Comments on: Logging with Ninject http://mhinze.com/logging-with-ninject/ Matt Hinze, learning in public Fri, 26 Feb 2010 17:28:00 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: David Wainwright http://mhinze.com/logging-with-ninject/comment-page-1/#comment-445 David Wainwright Thu, 29 Oct 2009 10:36:14 +0000 http://mhinze.com/?p=10#comment-445 Hi, Thanks for that. How would I bind to a specific, named logger in the config file? Your example uses the root logger only. Regards Dave Hi,

Thanks for that. How would I bind to a specific, named logger in the config file? Your example uses the root logger only.

Regards

Dave

]]> By: PandaWood http://mhinze.com/logging-with-ninject/comment-page-1/#comment-322 PandaWood Sat, 13 Jun 2009 03:53:17 +0000 http://mhinze.com/?p=10#comment-322 Thanks for this. I'm wondering, you've got 10 lines of code, just to create a Logger property. Could you just create a C#3 auto-property, and set up all loggers to be NullLogger.Instance by default? That would get that first code example down to 2/3 lines of code. All that said, I'm already using Ninject and I currently have logging set up outside of DI (see code below). So I was reading your blog to learn how to get my log4net to play with Ninject. But I must admit, I'm struggling to see what adding 9 lines of code to this is going to give me. static readonly ILog _log = LogManager.GetLogger(typeof(MyClass).Name); Thanks for this.

I’m wondering, you’ve got 10 lines of code, just to create a Logger property.

Could you just create a C#3 auto-property, and set up all loggers to be NullLogger.Instance by default? That would get that first code example down to 2/3 lines of code.

All that said, I’m already using Ninject and I currently have logging set up outside of DI (see code below). So I was reading your blog to learn how to get my log4net to play with Ninject.

But I must admit, I’m struggling to see what adding 9 lines of code to this is going to give me.

static readonly ILog _log = LogManager.GetLogger(typeof(MyClass).Name);

]]> By: Nate Kohari http://mhinze.com/logging-with-ninject/comment-page-1/#comment-26 Nate Kohari Wed, 25 Jun 2008 19:03:48 +0000 http://mhinze.com/?p=10#comment-26 Cool idea with the Modules static class, that can clean up the kernel definition pretty nicely. I also like your idea of changing how the AutoWiringExtension works. I think I'm going to either get rid of the AutoWiringMethodHeuristic or provide switches to enable/disable the different types of injection. Thanks for your praise for Ninject, it's great to see the fun stuff people are doing with it now! Cool idea with the Modules static class, that can clean up the kernel definition pretty nicely. I also like your idea of changing how the AutoWiringExtension works. I think I’m going to either get rid of the AutoWiringMethodHeuristic or provide switches to enable/disable the different types of injection.

Thanks for your praise for Ninject, it’s great to see the fun stuff people are doing with it now!

]]> By: Reflective Perspective - Chris Alcock » The Morning Brew #120 http://mhinze.com/logging-with-ninject/comment-page-1/#comment-18 Reflective Perspective - Chris Alcock » The Morning Brew #120 Mon, 23 Jun 2008 07:21:15 +0000 http://mhinze.com/?p=10#comment-18 [...] Logging with Ninject - Matt Hinze looks at using NInject 1.0’s logging integration with Log4Net, in response to the posts that Casey Charlton has been making about Castle Windsor and Log4Net. [...] [...] Logging with Ninject – Matt Hinze looks at using NInject 1.0’s logging integration with Log4Net, in response to the posts that Casey Charlton has been making about Castle Windsor and Log4Net. [...]

]]>