Comments on: Breaking up with the ternary operator http://mhinze.com/breaking-up-with-the-ternary-operator/ Matt Hinze, learning in public Thu, 01 Jul 2010 09:35:09 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: Eric Schaefer http://mhinze.com/breaking-up-with-the-ternary-operator/comment-page-1/#comment-455 Eric Schaefer Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:02:36 +0000 http://mhinze.com/breaking-up-with-the-ternary-operator/#comment-455 Well, imagine line 2 and 3 of the code in the previous comment indended... Well, imagine line 2 and 3 of the code in the previous comment indended…

]]> By: Eric Schaefer http://mhinze.com/breaking-up-with-the-ternary-operator/comment-page-1/#comment-454 Eric Schaefer Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:01:23 +0000 http://mhinze.com/breaking-up-with-the-ternary-operator/#comment-454 I never liked the ternary operator, but as of lately I am using it sometimes, but with special formatting: result = isItMondayAgain() ? "Yes, it is!" : "No, it isn't!"; I never liked the ternary operator, but as of lately I am using it sometimes, but with special formatting:

result = isItMondayAgain()
? “Yes, it is!”
: “No, it isn’t!”;

]]> By: Justin Etheredge http://mhinze.com/breaking-up-with-the-ternary-operator/comment-page-1/#comment-452 Justin Etheredge Tue, 17 Nov 2009 20:22:26 +0000 http://mhinze.com/breaking-up-with-the-ternary-operator/#comment-452 I agree that it can be ugly, but until the if...then block in C# can return a value, there will always be a small number of cases where the ternary operator will be more readable. I agree that it can be ugly, but until the if…then block in C# can return a value, there will always be a small number of cases where the ternary operator will be more readable.

]]> By: Arnis L. http://mhinze.com/breaking-up-with-the-ternary-operator/comment-page-1/#comment-451 Arnis L. Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:08:49 +0000 http://mhinze.com/breaking-up-with-the-ternary-operator/#comment-451 Works for me fine. Just avoid double/triple ternary operators. Those are pure evil. :) Works for me fine. Just avoid double/triple ternary operators. Those are pure evil. :)

]]>